<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kubuntu / Windows XP Dual Boot on Asus Eee PC 1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/</link>
	<description>...   Science, photography, games, entertainment, gadgets, health, rants and raves.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatmatters2me.com/?p=51#comment-21</guid>
		<description>8 GBs is pretty small for an XP installation even if you are putting programs on the 32 GB drive.  It&#039;s always going to be complaining about space.  I&#039;ve still got the same setup as when I set this up some nine months ago, and XP is still running smoothly, if not quickly.  So, yes, I still think the linux on the 8 and XP on the 32 is the best way to go.

Note however, that I&#039;m now a fan of Ubuntu over Kubuntu, as it feels more polished and smooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 GBs is pretty small for an XP installation even if you are putting programs on the 32 GB drive.  It&#8217;s always going to be complaining about space.  I&#8217;ve still got the same setup as when I set this up some nine months ago, and XP is still running smoothly, if not quickly.  So, yes, I still think the linux on the 8 and XP on the 32 is the best way to go.</p>
<p>Note however, that I&#8217;m now a fan of Ubuntu over Kubuntu, as it feels more polished and smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatmatters2me.com/?p=51#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this info - I&#039;d like to ask a question that I hope doesn&#039;t sound too foolish.  

Full disclosure: I am not savvy with computers, but have many helpful compsci friends.  
Summary of question:  XP currently installed on 8G drive, running slower than molasses.  Better deal to install/move to 32 and install Linux on the 8?

Details of question: I bought the 1000 with the intention to dual-boot, but had no access to an optical drive to install XP.  Brought it to my school&#039;s IT dept. with an instruction to install XP on the 32G drive... the kid who worked on my computer couldn&#039;t manage that, somehow, so he installed XP on the 8G.  Immediate problems.  The computer was slow, programs ran choppily... I uninstalled a lot of dreck and moved what programs I could to the D.  

Even so, I&#039;ve spent the past 9 months constantly getting messages that my memory is critically low, under 200MB, yadda yadda.  I still want to dual boot, but am beginning to wonder if putting linux on the 8 and XP on the 32 is the right way to go.  Any advice?

(To top all this off, the D began disappearing at startup, reappearing, problems Asus completely failed to repair when I sent the unit in for repairs earlier this summer.  Worst customer service ever - I&#039;m finally getting the thing back tomorrow!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info &#8211; I&#8217;d like to ask a question that I hope doesn&#8217;t sound too foolish.  </p>
<p>Full disclosure: I am not savvy with computers, but have many helpful compsci friends.<br />
Summary of question:  XP currently installed on 8G drive, running slower than molasses.  Better deal to install/move to 32 and install Linux on the 8?</p>
<p>Details of question: I bought the 1000 with the intention to dual-boot, but had no access to an optical drive to install XP.  Brought it to my school&#8217;s IT dept. with an instruction to install XP on the 32G drive&#8230; the kid who worked on my computer couldn&#8217;t manage that, somehow, so he installed XP on the 8G.  Immediate problems.  The computer was slow, programs ran choppily&#8230; I uninstalled a lot of dreck and moved what programs I could to the D.  </p>
<p>Even so, I&#8217;ve spent the past 9 months constantly getting messages that my memory is critically low, under 200MB, yadda yadda.  I still want to dual boot, but am beginning to wonder if putting linux on the 8 and XP on the 32 is the right way to go.  Any advice?</p>
<p>(To top all this off, the D began disappearing at startup, reappearing, problems Asus completely failed to repair when I sent the unit in for repairs earlier this summer.  Worst customer service ever &#8211; I&#8217;m finally getting the thing back tomorrow!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesD</title>
		<link>http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatmatters2me.com/?p=51#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the useful info. It&#039;s so interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful info. It&#8217;s so interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.whatmatters2me.com/2008/12/kubuntu-windows-xp-dual-boot-on-asus-eee-pc-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatmatters2me.com/?p=51#comment-18</guid>
		<description>After having longed for a couple of Windows programs, I also decided to install XP on my EEE PC 1000. I was a bit worried, because I heard that performance of the 32 GB SSD is poor. (But I stumbled over your howto afterwards, so it looks like it should be okay for every day use.) However, I hope that after turning of the virtual memory, it will work okay. Read is supposed to be the same on the 8 and the 32...

I managed to install XP directly on the 32 GB hard drive without making a small partition for XP on the 8 GB one using WinSetupForUSB. The important point is, that you choose the right partition for boot.ini (which I could not do using multiboot). It looks fairly nice this way, three partitions, a 20 GB one for XP, the rest for home, and the 8GB disk for linux root (I decided not to have swap space...). I can decide directly through the BIOS (by pressing ESC), which hard drive I want to start from, so I don&#039;t need to mess with the boot loader, even though that should be no problem.

I am quite happy so far...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having longed for a couple of Windows programs, I also decided to install XP on my EEE PC 1000. I was a bit worried, because I heard that performance of the 32 GB SSD is poor. (But I stumbled over your howto afterwards, so it looks like it should be okay for every day use.) However, I hope that after turning of the virtual memory, it will work okay. Read is supposed to be the same on the 8 and the 32&#8230;</p>
<p>I managed to install XP directly on the 32 GB hard drive without making a small partition for XP on the 8 GB one using WinSetupForUSB. The important point is, that you choose the right partition for boot.ini (which I could not do using multiboot). It looks fairly nice this way, three partitions, a 20 GB one for XP, the rest for home, and the 8GB disk for linux root (I decided not to have swap space&#8230;). I can decide directly through the BIOS (by pressing ESC), which hard drive I want to start from, so I don&#8217;t need to mess with the boot loader, even though that should be no problem.</p>
<p>I am quite happy so far&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 289/306 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.whatmatters2me.com @ 2011-11-12 22:36:31 -->
